Bug#584430: transition: osm-gps-map
Hi,
On 10/06/10 20:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From the release side, I think I'd mentally filed this under "waiting
> for feedback from the gpxviewer maintainer(s)". If they're ok with it
> then I don't see any particular problems; note that if they happen to
> intersect with the Python transition then the packages may get blocked
> in unstable until python is ready to transition.
Sorry, didn't realise that I needed to reply. I can't see any problems
apart from those depreciation warnings, and work has already started
upstream to fix gpxviewer for the new API version.
Regards,
Andrew Gee
Reply to: