On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:31:41 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > Hello Adam, > > On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 18:46:24 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > The package does actually have one reverse dependency - gpxviewer, which > > uses the Python bindings. > > Oops, I missed to check those. Yes, you're right. I'm CCing the gpxviewer > maintainer. > > > Are there any changes which are likely to affect the bindings? > > Yes, there are, since those are direct bindings to the .so library. Upstream > provided new functions, and old ones are deprecated, but they're using new > ones for compatibility. > > The only thing happening is some more output on the console, with the > deprecation warnings. Otherwise, gpxviewer works fine. > > [..] Any news for this transition? Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature