[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#570356: marked as done (transition: directfb - soname change)



Your message dated Tue, 11 May 2010 18:46:54 +0100
with message-id <1273600014.27409.241.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#570356: transition: directfb - soname change
has caused the Debian Bug report #570356,
regarding transition: directfb - soname change
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
570356: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570356
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal

follow-up to http://bugs.debian.org/569815

DirectFB 1.2.9 introduce a soname change.

libdirectfb-dev reverse build-depends:
------------------------------

gst-plugins-bad0.10
libsdl1.2
splashy
cairo
freesci
directvnc
links2
lives
mplayer
qingy
xine-lib
gtk+2.0

------------------------------

Could you schedule this transition and the related binNMUs ?

As a side note, I would like to push Phonon 4.3.80/Qt 4.6.2
(directfb->gtk->qt)to Sid, right after directfb transition.
Another bug report will follow to track Phonon and Qt schedule.

Cheers,

Fathi

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2010-04-17 at 21:36 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 23:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:29 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Thu, March 25, 2010 08:27, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > > >> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the
> > > >> binNMUs.
> > > >
> > > > Upload to unstable done.
> > > 
> > > It's now made it out of NEW, so I've scheduled the binNMUs (with
> > > appropriate dep-waits).
> > 
> > A quick status update...
> 
> and another :)

One more :-)

After a few further issues (and by breaking opal and ekiga on hppa),
directfb transitioned to testing this morning; I'm therefore closing
this tracking bug.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Reply to: