Bug#580100: pu: package libnet-smtp-server-perl/1.1-3+lenny1
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
#579492 (a missing dependency) also affects stable, therefore I'd
like to upload a fixed version with the trivial change to spu.
(Thanks to Rhonda for spotting!)
The debdiff for the proposed upload is:
#v+
diff -u libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/control libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/control
- --- libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/control
+++ libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/control
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
Package: libnet-smtp-server-perl
Architecture: all
- -Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
+Depends: ${perl:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, libnet-dns-perl
Description: A native Perl SMTP Server implementation for Perl
The Net::SMTP::Server module implements an RFC 821 compliant SMTP
server, completely in Perl. It's extremely extensible, so adding in
diff -u libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/changelog libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/changelog
- --- libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/changelog
+++ libnet-smtp-server-perl-1.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libnet-smtp-server-perl (1.1-3+lenny1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Add dependency on libnet-dns-perl (closes: #579492).
+
+ -- gregor herrmann <gregoa@debian.org> Mon, 03 May 2010 17:59:48 +0200
+
libnet-smtp-server-perl (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* New maintainer (Closes: #430979)
#v-
Please advise on how to proceed.
Cheers,
gregor
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)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=CvuF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: