Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch

To: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>
Cc: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, ftpmaster@debian.org
Subject: Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:32:08 +0000
Message-id: <1260577928.4769.2259.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
In-reply-to: <4B22E0BD.5080007@debian.org>
References: <19234.48863.186908.758468@ron.nulle.part> <1260570907.4769.612.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net> <4B22E0BD.5080007@debian.org>

On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 01:15 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt schrieb:
> > ftp-team: Please decruft libquantlib-0.9.9.

That should have been libquantlib-0.9.7, clearly.  Apologies for the
confusion.

However, afaics you assumed that anyway :) Thanks for the follow-up.

> # Broken Depends:
> quantlib-swig: quantlib-python [amd64 hurd-i386]
>                quantlib-ruby [amd64]
> rquantlib: r-cran-rquantlib
> 
> BinNMUs should be scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
  - From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
  - From: Torsten Werner <twerner@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Next by Date: Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Previous by thread: Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Next by thread: Re: quantlib 0.9.9 is nine days old but has not been built on any arch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread