Re: new ICU in unstable: transition required
Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 08:13:01PM -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> You may have a more reliable list. As no special uploads should be
>> required to make this transition happen, I hope it will be fairly
>> smooth.
>
> It will be much more smoother if you put back the workaround
> for #484053. In my testing this is fixed in gcc-snapshot,
> and instead of -O0, -Os is sufficient to work around the issue.
Dropping this was an oversight that happened because I forgot to merge
3.8 changes after I prepared 4.0 into the 4.0 packages. I'll add it
back and upload again this morning. Thanks.
--Jay
Reply to: