Re: on removing roxen4
Hi,
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other
>> not built from source).
>> Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4
>> would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils)
>> have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4
>> popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be
>> removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.
> Aren't you missing some reverse-deps here?
> bzed@think:~$ apt-cache rdepends roxen4 | grep libroxen | wc -l
> 83
Thanks for pointing that out. However, most of these are "| caudium",
which remains available.
I actually tested "dak rm -nR -s testing roxen4", so I believe that both
dependencies and build-dependencies are covered.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
Reply to: