on removing roxen4

[Thomas Viehmann <tv@beamnet.de>]

Hi,

according to #495663, roxen4 includes binaries without source (and other
not built from source).
Given that neither it nor its (absolute, i.e. fully broken when roxen4
would be removed) reverse dependencies (libroxen-form libroxen-xmlutils)
have been in the last stable release or are terribly popular (roxen4
popcon is 15 installs), I wonder whether the default option should be
removal from testing if this isn't fixed in a timely manner.

Kind regards

T.
-- 
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/