Re: heimdal

[Luk Claes <luk@debian.org>]

Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> writes:
>> * Russ Allbery [Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:38:44 -0700]:
>>> It looks correct to me for the krb5 interface.  It looks like some of the
>>> internal libraries that Heimdal uses (maybe libroken and libasn1,
>>> although I'm not sure) aren't using symbol versioning, but since that
>>> isn't the API that's shared with MIT Kerberos, that shouldn't matter in
>>> practice.  I doubt this is a regression from the previous state; they
>>> were probably never using symbol versioning.
>> Ok, thank you; I scheduled the binNMUs now, which are mostly ready now,
>> and will migrate the new version next.
> 
> How is the heimdal transition going? Are all the hints in place? I though you 
> had to put all the packages that are to go in together on the same hint line.

heimdal is already hinted, the only remaining problem is that
cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg gets broken:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
  cyrus-sasl2-heimdal-dbg: Depends: cyrus-sasl2-dbg (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-22)
but it is not going to be installed
E: Broken packages

This is a serious bug in cyrus-sasl2-heimdal.

Cheers

Luk