[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please unblock openocd/0.0+r655-1.1



On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 05:04:33PM +0000, Riku Voipio wrote:
> I'm terribly sorry, the mail below is sent by me, not by Thijs.
> That should teach me being more carefull when for using esc-e
> to get a template from a existing mail on mutt... :(
> 
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:00:59PM +0300, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please unblock openocd/0.0+r655-1.1
> > 
> > openocd/0.0+r655-1 was already approved, but couldn't migrate
> > to testing due to not building on arm/armel ( #489048 ).
> > 
> > The only change done is the following:
> > 
> > diff -u openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> > --- openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> > +++ openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> > @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@
> >         --enable-at91rm9200 \
> >         --enable-usbprog \
> >         --enable-presto_libftdi \
> > -       --enable-dummy \
> > -       --enable-ecosboard
> > +       --enable-dummy
> > 
> >  # Don't add --enable-gw16012 and --enable-amtjtagaccel on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
> >  # as they're currently not supported there.

unblocked.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpWbk8WrECtZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: