[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: please unblock openocd/0.0+r655-1.1



I'm terribly sorry, the mail below is sent by me, not by Thijs.
That should teach me being more carefull when for using esc-e
to get a template from a existing mail on mutt... :(

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 08:00:59PM +0300, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Please unblock openocd/0.0+r655-1.1
> 
> openocd/0.0+r655-1 was already approved, but couldn't migrate
> to testing due to not building on arm/armel ( #489048 ).
> 
> The only change done is the following:
> 
> diff -u openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> --- openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> +++ openocd-0.0+r655/debian/rules
> @@ -21,8 +21,7 @@
>         --enable-at91rm9200 \
>         --enable-usbprog \
>         --enable-presto_libftdi \
> -       --enable-dummy \
> -       --enable-ecosboard
> +       --enable-dummy
> 
>  # Don't add --enable-gw16012 and --enable-amtjtagaccel on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD
>  # as they're currently not supported there.
> 
> 



-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: