[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: BinNMUing packages linking against libgnutls13

On 2008-05-26 Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> wrote:
> * Andreas Metzler [Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:24:30 +0200]:
> > libgnutls26 has been part of etch for two months now, and the old
> > version libgnutls13 definitly should not be shipped in lenny. (Dummy
> > bug: #475663)

> I took a look at the state of this as of today, and there is now only a
> handful of packages *in testing* that depend on gnutls13.

Thanks, I occasionally take a look there, too.

> These can be classified in two groups, those that in unstable *still*
> depend on gnutls13, and those that don't, but that haven't migrated for
> other reasons. Here's a list:
> Still depend on gnutls13 in sid
> ===============================
> lynx            - you know about this one :)

Not much progress, though.

> mailutils       - FTBFS due to test failures (#461998)
> mergeant        - libgnomedb3 not built yet on ia64 (FTBFS #482263)

It is not rebuildable in sid anywhere, due to breakage in glade 480764
(block in bts already added)

> vlc             - FTBFS on arm

internal compiler error since April-12

> wengophone      - FTBFS (#479920)

build-system breakage, uses a special strange build-system on top of
cmake that suddenly seems to simply break instead of to give a "not
found" back if optional stuff is not installed. Even after working
around this by installing  python2.5-dev and  libx11-dev it still
failed to build at some later point.
cu andreas

`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Reply to: