On Sunday 18 May 2008, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > That would imply that something in the base system is still built > > against the OpenLDAP 2.1 libraries and probably needs to be binNMU'd. > > (And the current OpenLDAP packages desperately need another maintainer > > with time to work on them, but that's a different problem.) > > I don't see such package. Maybe it has to do with the fact that that > libldap2 is still Prio: important? Frans, are Prio: important packages > pulled by the default base system install? Yes. debootstrap always installs packages with prio important or higher. That is what defines the "base system".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.