Re: "new bugs" already fixed
* Simon Huggins (firstname.lastname@example.org) [080509 12:20]:
> On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:39:28AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 10:37:51AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:27:12AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > > telegnome (- to 0.1.0-3)
> > > > Maintainer: Colin Watson
> > > > Too young, only 1 of 10 days old
> > > > out of date on alpha: telegnome (from 0.0.10-7)
> > > > out of date on hppa: telegnome (from 0.0.10-7)
> > > > telegnome (source, i386, alpha, amd64, arm, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc, armel) has new bugs!
> > > > Updating telegnome introduces new bugs: #464331
> > > > Not considered
> > > In BugsV there is "telegnome 464331". This is because the package is
> > > not in sync on all architectures and thus contains buggy versions in
> > > unstable (0.0.10-7).
> > Ah, right. Sorry for the false alarm, then!
> It does say "introduces new bugs" (twice) and "has new bugs". These
> aren't true; the bugs are only in the out of date package.
In case it would migrate to testing as is, a new RC bug would be present
in some of the binary packages. In case only armel would be
out-of-date, it would even be relevant to not allow testing migration.