On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:41:59PM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 04:54:29PM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 07:15:11AM +0000, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > Isn't it risky for partial upgrades from etch ? Shouldn't we wait for > > > > lenny+1 to revert this ? > > > > > > I second that, please don't revert the patch until lenny+1. FWIW I > > > believe the release team as a whole wanted the patch to be kept as well, > > > but I'll let the other members correct me if I'm wrong. > > > > that's fine with me, as long as > > > > - the release team commits to maintain this patch > > - the release team commits to check every bug report filed against > > gcc with an upstream build and report back to the Debian BTS > > - the release team shows that it is able to do so, and has done so > > in the past. > > This will last up to the lenny release, and the toolchain is to be > freezed next week. So I don't ... ... think you'll have to support that patch actively for too long. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpfud2QQvZXO.pgp
Description: PGP signature