Re: binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2
Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 23:49 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:20:41AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 04.03.2008, 00:02 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 05:15:00AM +0100, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > could you please schedule binNMUs for gtk-sharp2 2.10.4-2? The previous
> > > > one had a broken clilibs control file, resulting in bugs like #468906
> > > > (builds against new version won't work with old version).
>
> > > > gnome-sharp2 2.16.1-1
>
> > > How do I know by looking at the packages which architectures need binNMUed
> > > and which don't?
>
> > If the packages have dependencies on libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.10.1) or
> > libgtk2.0-cil (>= 2.10.1) they need a binNMU. Those dependencies should
> > all be >= 2.10.4
>
> It looks like gnome-sharp2 depended on (>= 2.10.2), not (>= 2.10.1); does it
> still need binNMUed?
Yes, I meant 2.10.2, sorry.
> And the packages that depend on libglib2.0-cil (>= 2.10.2) have arch: all
> packages built from the same source which have the same dependency - do
> those packages also need to be rebuilt? If so, these packages need
> sourceful uploads, not binNMUs.
Ok, then I'll do a sourceful upload instead. Just curious, but why are
binNMUs of arch: all packages not possible?
Reply to: