Re: binNMU request: libexiv2-0 => libexiv2-2
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:06:50PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > The subject is misleading; you seem to be asking for permission to start a
> > transition, not for binNMUs?
> > If all of these packages have the same versions in testing and unstable,
> > then it should be fine to start the transition. If some do not, then those
> > would need closer examination to be sure they aren't tied to existing
> > transitions.
> from christopher martin about gwenview:
> "you could go ahead with the exiv2 transition and then binNMU
> gwenview, but I guess to complete the transition quickly you'd need to
> yank gwenview from testing, where it would remain absent until gcc-4.3
> moves down (corrent me if I'm wrong here)."
There's no reason for that at all. gcc-4.3 is no longer a blocker for
gwenview in testing (the requisite version of gcc-4.3 has already passed to
testing), and even if it were, gwenview would almost certainly not be the
only package affected by the libgcc shlibs bump.
> exiv2-0.16-1 uploaded today. it's in the NEW queue.
Ok, sounds good.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/