Le mardi 22 janvier 2008 à 11:58 +0100, Matthias Klose a écrit : > If some people are unwilling to use metadata (Steve Langasek's mail > about which packages need a rebuild is unanswered), then it should not > hinder others to use it correctly instead of moving it out of our > metadata data base. The metadata is both insufficient and incorrect, and it is not possible to use it to generate the list of packages needing a rebuild. You can still argue about the contrary and generate a wrong list, but I doubt it will be useful to anyone. > One goal of the last python transition was to ease transitions and > migrations between unstable and testing. Recently people add > versioned dependencies again to packages as a more comfortable way to > specify dependencies for applications not using the standard python > version. This is countproductive to transitions, as the removal of a > supported python version requires immediate recompilation of all other > packages depending on this version. This should be fixed before the > transition. I'll file bug reports for these packages. These dependencies are necessary for python:Provides to be meaningful. If they are removed, then most python:Provides fields MUST be removed as well. Otherwise, you might have easier transitions, but wrong dependencies. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=