[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > That's not how hinting works.
>  Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency.

Please contact d-release next time to get the issue resolved.

> OK, please remove false liblame-dev dependency from m68k (sparc seems
> to be removed meanwhile).

This is done.

>  So vice can be arch: all, even if s390 says not-for-us, right?

Not arch:all (architecture independent) but arch:any (as it's
architecture dependent), but yes.  The s390 porter noted to remove the
not-for-us.  I also reported a RC bug about this.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
 .''`.  Philipp Kern                            (proud) Debian Developer
: :' :  http://philkern.de                              Ubuntu MOTU
`. `'   xmpp:phil@0x539.de
  `-    finger pkern/key@db.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: