[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hint for vice/1.22-2

Hi Steve,

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 13:30 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:26:59PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> That's not how hinting works.
 Thought so, but couldn't get porters to remove the false dependency.

> But that seems unlikely to happen, since you've removed s390 and sparc from
> the architecture list for this package for reasons completely unrelated to
> portability.  If you need help getting action taken regarding a wrong
> dep-wait on a buildd, please ask debian-release -- but don't just decide to
> stop supporting an architecture.
 OK, please remove false liblame-dev dependency from m68k (sparc seems
to be removed

> s390 may be a different matter since the package has been marked
> "Not-for-us" (grumble) by the buildd maintainer; but the binary still has to
> be removed from unstable to let the package propagate naturally into
> testing.
 So vice can be arch: all, even if s390 says not-for-us, right?


Reply to: