[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bin NMUs for the libvte4 -> libvte9 transition



On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:41:01PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mer, 2007-04-25 at 22:23 +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
> > in doubt, I requested it as I saw no harm in doing this: IIUC,
> >  uploading a new xfce4-terminal source resets the dep-wait + bin NMU. 

> yeah, but we upload just after you requested the binNMU, without even
> knowing you just did that. And the binNMU was scheduled after it was
> accepted.

Well, that's only possible because w-b hasn't been pulling from incoming
lately.

On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 10:46:05PM +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >  Your upload triggered a failed build on s390, because the
> > upload cleared the dep-wait for the binNMU
> >  and your package does not have a
> > versioned build-dependency on vte (and probably should not, either). 

> Well, we do have a build-dep on libvte-dev (>= 1:0.14).

Ok, then I don't know why this s390 failure happened.  I guess maybe the
auto-dep-wait cleared, but the s390 buildd was pulling from a stale mirror
and got the old version of libvte-dev by mistake.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/



Reply to: