Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:18:06PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > sceduled for the batch upload tomorrow.
> with some delay, but uploaded now.
Could you please explain this part of the diff?
--- kqemu-1.3.0~pre9/debian/control.modules.in
+++ kqemu-1.3.0~pre9/debian/control.modules.in
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
Package: kqemu-modules-_KVERS_
Architecture: any
-Depends: linux-image-_KVERS_
+Depends: linux-modules-_KVERS_, kqemu-common
Recommends: qemu (>= 0.8.1)
Provides: kqemu-modules
Description: kqemu modules for Linux (kernel _KVERS_).
Also,
+
+ mkdir debian/kqemu-common/dev
+ mknod debian/kqemu-common/dev/kqemu c 250 0
+ chmod 0666 debian/kqemu-common/dev/kqemu
+
this is a policy violation. You're not allowed to ship device nodes in a
package.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: Please unblock kqemu, second try
- From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>