On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:37:28PM +0000, Luk Claes wrote: > Pierre Habouzit wrote: > >On jeu, aoû 30, 2007 at 11:51:36 +0000, Luk Claes wrote: > >>Pierre Habouzit > >>393403 Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's > > NMUed. > > Hmm, it seems you didn't follow the NMU rules, for instance I see no > patch in the bug log nor a trace of informing the maintainer days ago > about your intention to NMU? Hmm you mean I should inform a Maintainer's package for a package whose last 4 uploads since 2006-10-27 are NMUs ? for a bug that is what, 10 months old ? Heh. It qualifies to the 0-day NMU policy for so many reasons that well... Anyways, nmudiff sent to the bug report, I did that in the first place, but mistyped bugs.debian.org so it bounced, and you just made me notice that. > > >356055 loadlin: loadlin.exe cannot be built from source > > That one is a b*tch :) Yasm upstream do not seem to care about tasm > >compatibility at _all_. So I'm now investigating wether loadlin is still > >needed or not (last time it was needed for accessibility reasons, I > >don't know if there is alternatives e.g. if win32-loader works properly > >for blind people). Investigating. > > But at a first glance, I don't see an immediate way to have this > >fixed. > > Please try to reach as close as possible to 'a' fix as described in the > mail and don't hesitate to fix other RC bugs (preferably not the ones > appointed to other candidates ;-)) Sure, I don't consider this bug "fixed" yet, I have to contact people aware of accessibility issues to know if win32-loader is a proper replacement for loadlin or not. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpinahZBp8Z7.pgp
Description: PGP signature