Re: Release Goal Proposal: texlive-transition
Steve Langasek <email@example.com> wrote:
> While I think this is a useful case for mass-bugfiling, and that any NMUers
> of the affected packages should consider fixing these issues /when an NMU is
> already needed/, it's my impression that the alternative dependency is of
> only superficial importance. I don't see any benefit to the quality of
> lenny for the release team to sanction this as an official "release goal"
> with sanctioned 0-day NMUs.
- tetex-bin and tetex-extra do still exist, as metapackages, and we
would like to have the freedom to change their dependencies as we
learn about users' needs, without bothering whether some package is
broken by this.
- It would be nice if tetex-doc, and therefore the complete tetex-base
source package, could be removed.
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)