[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: poppler transition

Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 13:31:30 +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> wrote:
>> > Affected source packages:
>> >
>> > Package: tetex-bin
>> > Package: texlive-bin
>> Even one less, because we plan that the next upload of texlive-bin will
>> create libkpathsea{4,-dev} binary packages, and tetex-bin can be
>> removed.  
>> However, that will require NEW processing.  Should we separate these two
>> steps in order to get the poppler change in as soon as possible, or just
>> go ahead?
> If the packages added in texlive-bin are already in the archive (even if
> built by another source package), then it shouldn't go into NEW, afaik.

I thought this had been the case, but was changed about a year ago?  Or
maybe not, since when we introduced tetex-base, there was either no NEW
processing, or it was very fast.

Regards, Frank
Dr. Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)

Reply to: