Steve Langasek schrieb: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:50:21AM +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com" wrote: >> Steve Langasek schrieb: >>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 01:46:28PM +0100, "schönfeld / in-medias-res.com" wrote: >>>> sorry, that I opened another thread. I didn't see that Mark opened one. > >>>> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt' wrote: >>>>> Mark Purcell <msp@debian.org> writes: >>>>>> It is requested that smstools (3.0.2-4) be allowed into etch; debconf >>>>>> translations and bug fixes. >>>>> We are only allowing rc bug fixes in now, so this update >>>>> won't get into etch. > >>>> Well, i understand this and this release *does* fix an rc bug. > >>> According to the changelog, it does not. > >>> Where is the RC bug report in the BTS for this, with the explanation of the >>> bug? > >> See #403615. This bug should have been closed in version 3.0.2-3 which >> is not in testing because the script that has been added to solve the >> (imho) rc bug were errornous. > > That bug is not RC. It only pertains to upgrades from version 3.0-1, which > is not the version in sarge. Well, thats true. I see, that i missed that point. But there are other bugs fixed in 3.0.2-4 (due to beeing fixed in 3.0.2-3) which make it perfectly sensefull to let it into etch. E.g. there are problems with the init script (#403616) which do cause that smstools cannot be stopped under some conditions leading to an undefined state. Also it does cause that if some users want to remove/purge smstools from his etch system he can't do this under some circumstances, because of the init script failing (exiting with rc 1). Also it would be a shame to miss all the localisations in the stable release that has been added since 3.0.2-2. Greets Patrick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature