> > no problem; for nufw, you're talking about a total revamp of the debconf > > templates, which isn't something I'm going to accept without maintainer > > input. > > > Whether or not this is a total revamp can be discussed. > > What is done is the following: I have a ready update for t-p-u which I intend to propose tomorrow. So far, jean-Michel did not react to these mails so I don't know whether he considers the changes acceptable or not. Again, they are as minimal as possible. Most changes are using wording from the version in unstable (which is a rewrite I did back in October/November last year). Others are rewrite in the exact same spirit. Translations have been as updated as possible (anyway, none is currently complete in testing). I really think that this update is worth it. I will even build with pbuilder and not cowbuilder if you insist, Steve..:-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature