[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

please unblock apt-listchanges 2.72.2



  There is two translation updates, plus a possibly very problematic
problem on upgrades for people that did had some old .py[co] floating
around.

  attached is the diff stripped down from the debian/po related chunks.


Cheers,
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
diff -Nru /tmp/GSmeltIsZR/apt-listchanges-2.72.1/debian/changelog /tmp/SJZddzRLl4/apt-listchanges-2.72.2/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/GSmeltIsZR/apt-listchanges-2.72.1/debian/changelog	2007-01-21 21:09:01.000000000 +0100
+++ /tmp/SJZddzRLl4/apt-listchanges-2.72.2/debian/changelog	2007-02-13 10:43:13.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+apt-listchanges (2.72.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Remove useless pt_PT.po (Closes: 408880).
+  * Update nl.po thans to Frans Pop (Closes: 410544).
+  * Remove old .pyo/.pyc from quite older packages (Closes: 397107).
+
+ -- Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>  Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:43:11 +0100
+
 apt-listchanges (2.72.1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Add Czech debconf messages thanks to Miroslav Kure (Closes: 407827).
diff -Nru /tmp/GSmeltIsZR/apt-listchanges-2.72.1/debian/preinst /tmp/SJZddzRLl4/apt-listchanges-2.72.2/debian/preinst
--- /tmp/GSmeltIsZR/apt-listchanges-2.72.1/debian/preinst	2006-08-10 22:28:01.000000000 +0200
+++ /tmp/SJZddzRLl4/apt-listchanges-2.72.2/debian/preinst	2007-02-13 10:42:33.000000000 +0100
@@ -4,6 +4,13 @@
 
 hook=/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20listchanges
 
+if test -d /usr/lib/site-python; then
+    rm -f /usr/lib/site-python/apt_listchanges.pyo     || true
+    rm -f /usr/lib/site-python/apt_listchanges.pyc     || true
+    rm -f /usr/lib/site-python/DebianControlParser.pyo || true
+    rm -f /usr/lib/site-python/DebianControlParser.pyo || true
+fi
+
 if [ -f $hook.disabled ]; then
     mv $hook.disabled $hook
 fi

Attachment: pgpCFsLXSf5yB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: