Hi All, On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 11:37:23AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Saturday 03 February 2007 09:28, Frans Pop wrote: > > So, no, I don't think dejavu should be hinted yet. I'd like to see a > > bit more activity from the font people to check how things look _in_ > > the graphical installer first. > > I just noticed that the base size for ar and fa has increased too. > > Hmm. It is even increased for dz and hi, which are from different fonts. > Could it be that these size increases are only due to the increased font > size in the installer, and not at all to changes in dejavu? In that case > it would be good if the screenshots for 13 could be updated using a > current installer for better comparison. > It would also mean that Christian's argument regarding the improvement for > bn is invalid. When taking the latest screenshots I've integrated the gtk-set-font script currently used in g-i which changes default fontsize for some languages (bn, ar, fa and other languages); this has nothing to do with ttf-dejavu itself. As suggeste by Frans on IRC, I've just created new screenshots for dejavu 2.13 using this new per-language size change, so that comparison makes more sense: http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20070203_dejavu2.13 http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20070202_dejavu2.14 > The problem with accents seems to be a more general regression. Compare > also for example the accented y and N characters for be. These look fuzzy > in 14 when compared to 13. (For the y the accent is centered better > though.) > Same goes for r, e and s for cs. > > IMHO this should be fixed. I'll get in touch with upstream and hopefully come up with a patch ASAP: will post some news here in a couple of days and let you know how things evolve (will also file BRs to tack things more clearly). regards, Davide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature