Re: svn-buildpackage - broken in etch
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 08:08:54PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 January 2007 17:56, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Personally, I'm not sure this is warranted; svn-upgrade is an optional
> > feature of svn-buildpackage, which I don't think is used by terribly many
> > maintainers. And indeed, the changes related to svn_load_dirs alone are
> > fairly intrusive and arguably not suitable for a t-p-u upload.
> Eh?! svn-upgrade is *essential* to the typical use of svn-buildpackage; it
> would be a horrible inconvenience to not be able to use it. I use it for
> all of my packages.
Ok, I stand corrected.
Eduard, do you have any objections to the unstable version of
svn-buildpackage propagating to etch?
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.