[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: could thunar 0.4.0rc1-3 be uploaded to tpu and migrate to testing ?

On mer, 2007-01-24 at 04:26 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Yves-Aléxis,
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > we have received two translations fixes for thunar currently in testing.
> > I've prepared a package for tpu (as unstable has thunar 0.5 already).
> > There are the two translations patchs, and a little modification to the
> > long description.
> > Would it be allowed to upload it in tpu, and then have them go to
> > testing ?
> I don't understand the patch that this includes for a crash.
> > --- thunar-0.4.0rc1.orig/debian/patches/02_thunar-vfs-path_uri-list-crash.patch
> > +++ thunar-0.4.0rc1/debian/patches/02_thunar-vfs-path_uri-list-crash.patch
> Why does this code assume the buffer will only need to be increased in 512
> byte increments?

This patch is taken from upstream (see
http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2356 ). I preferred using the
patch actually commited to the tree (already present in latest thunar).

> If you omit this patch, I'll accept the translation-only fixes in t-p-u;
> otherwise more discussion is needed here.

I guess it'd be better with the patch (crash when selecting lots of file
can be really painfull) but if you think it's too invasive for Etch I'm
ok with it and can prepare another package without it.


Reply to: