José Luis Tallón wrote: > Christian Perrier wrote: >> Quoting Christian Perrier (bubulle@debian.org): >> >>>>> In my opinion this is only a minor change that will avoid a manual >>>>> move of the couriergraph.cgi script to the correct location. >>>>> >>>> Yes, I'm pretty sure this would be acceptable -- couriergraph is the only >>>> package in the archive using /usr/lib/cgi-lib, so as long as this is a >>>> script that is intended to be invoked directly as a CGI, moving it to the >>>> right place sounds fine. >>>> >>> Fine. With Steve's Holy Blessing, I'd be happy to sponsor that upload >>> but I prefer leaving this to the real maintainer, if possible. >>> >>> >> I'll do the upload today. >> >> José Luis, I added a few translations updates/additions and I also >> changed one of your changes: >> >> you switched from DH_COMPAT to debian/compat which is IMHO >> fine....however, doing so you changed the debhelper compatibility >> level from 4 to 5, which is definitely not acceptable by the release >> tema now (they already mentioned this to other maintainers). >> >> So, I changed it back to 4 in 0.25-2 which I'll upload. >> > > Thank you very much. > > > It seems it somehow slipped through my last check (not as thorough as it > should have been, it seems), when I realized that could be too much of a > change... plus makes backporters' life unnecesarily harder. Unblocked 0.25-3 Cheers Luk -- Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature