Re: permission to upload neon26
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 00:01 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <email@example.com> writes:
> > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:21:40PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> Well, .la needs to die, but I have to admit that breaking the .la
> >> interface this late in the release cycle was a bad idea. So yes, I think
> >> you should upload this (and would unblock it).
> > What do you mean, "this late"? The bug was reported before the general
> > freeze started, and the only thing it's reported to break is upstream
> > versions of subversion.
> After a short IRC conversation with vorlon, I'm of his opinion - so
> please do *not* upload the new -4 which is readding the .la files.
OK. I ask again, as there's a new upstream version, which is a
bugfix release only. The first is a security fix, which is available in
the NMU, but with the new upstream version number users can be sure they
have that fix. Also fixes a regression and a parameter handling.
May I upload it to unstable? If yes, would be the .la fix acceptable
Thanks for consideration,
 dget http://www.lsc.hu/gcs/deb/neon26_0.26.3-1.dsc