[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: permission to upload neon26



Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:21:40PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@lsc.hu> writes:
>>> The diff between 0.26.2-3 and 0.26.2-4 [1] is that a security fix is
>>> applied (accepted the NMU) and the fix of #400140 , which adds .la files
>>> again, but corrected with the power of sed. The latter would make neon26
>>> dependant upstream sources compilable again; fix was proposed by
>>> upstream.
>> Well, .la needs to die, but I have to admit that breaking the .la
>> interface this late in the release cycle was a bad idea. So yes, I think
>> you should upload this (and would unblock it).
> What do you mean, "this late"?  The bug was reported before the general
> freeze started, and the only thing it's reported to break is upstream
> versions of subversion.

After a short IRC conversation with vorlon, I'm of his opinion - so
please do *not* upload the new -4 which is readding the .la files.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #310:
asynchronous inode failure

Attachment: pgpTc2yrgE8MR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: