Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:21:40PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: >> Laszlo Boszormenyi <gcs@lsc.hu> writes: >>> The diff between 0.26.2-3 and 0.26.2-4 [1] is that a security fix is >>> applied (accepted the NMU) and the fix of #400140 , which adds .la files >>> again, but corrected with the power of sed. The latter would make neon26 >>> dependant upstream sources compilable again; fix was proposed by >>> upstream. >> Well, .la needs to die, but I have to admit that breaking the .la >> interface this late in the release cycle was a bad idea. So yes, I think >> you should upload this (and would unblock it). > What do you mean, "this late"? The bug was reported before the general > freeze started, and the only thing it's reported to break is upstream > versions of subversion. After a short IRC conversation with vorlon, I'm of his opinion - so please do *not* upload the new -4 which is readding the .la files. Marc -- BOFH #310: asynchronous inode failure
Attachment:
pgpL7DRgY8bOr.pgp
Description: PGP signature