Re: permission to upload neon26
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:21:40PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > The diff between 0.26.2-3 and 0.26.2-4  is that a security fix is
> > applied (accepted the NMU) and the fix of #400140 , which adds .la files
> > again, but corrected with the power of sed. The latter would make neon26
> > dependant upstream sources compilable again; fix was proposed by
> > upstream.
> Well, .la needs to die, but I have to admit that breaking the .la
> interface this late in the release cycle was a bad idea. So yes, I think
> you should upload this (and would unblock it).
What do you mean, "this late"? The bug was reported before the general
freeze started, and the only thing it's reported to break is upstream
versions of subversion.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.