Re: Erroneous upload of gnome-vfs2 2.16 to unstable
Loïc Minier wrote:
> I mistakingly uploaded gnome-vfs2 2.16 to unstable; it bumps shlibs and
> is incompatible with unstable's bonobo; it's not suitable for etch.
> First, sorry for this mistake.
> Second, here are the options:
> - upload bonobo 2.16 into unstable and upload updates via TPU until the
> - upload an epoched gnome-vfs2
Now that this incident has happened, and assuming that we're short before
a release, is there really a need to revert to 2.14 or something instead
of continuing with GNOME 2.16? The packages in etch could still be
updated via proposed-updates if they need to.
> PS: I didn't check gnome-vfs2's upload target as it was close to being a
> "simple rebuild" upload for experimental/i386 as we don't have a buildd
> there. I suppose I should work on introducing simple debian/rules
> checks in our experimental branch to fail when the target dist is
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.