[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Can I upload sqlalchemy 0.3.3-2 to unstable? (will you unblock it?)

Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Piotr Ozarowski <ozarow@gmail.com> writes:
> > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >> Piotr Ozarowski <ozarow@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> 0.3.2 and 0.3.3 upstream releases were mainly a bug fix releases (one
> >>> very important MySQL related bug was fixed) - they're available in
> >>> experimental since few weeks and no bugs were reported (except one about
> >>> new upstream version being available).
> >> I feel the diff is too big. Is there a bug in the version currently in
> >> etch that needs to be fixed urgently?
> > reported? No, but python-turbogears users who are using SQLAlchemy
> > (SQLObject is default) and MySQL will need it.
> So this will only affect users of a special, non-default flavour?

SQLAlchemy is getting more popular every day. It's more powerful than
SQLObject and Python frameworks/app. are using it as default or
are adding support for it (Django, Pylons, TurboGears - these are most
popular Python web frameworks and all can use SA, only TurboGears will
be in Etch though). I will also backport Griffith 0.9 (when we will
release final version) after Etch release and thus I'm interested in
having SA in more stable/faster version than 0.3.1. GNU Mailman's author is
moving to SQLAlchemy as well.

> > Please note that there is new documentation.html file in 0.3.2 (1 225
> > 964 bytes!)
> Yes, but that's not the only change. A big diff is, for a freeze
> exception, everything with more than 100 lines of code that were
> changed.

As I said before, debdiff is large (2 new upstreams) but these versions
are well tested. 0.3.4 will be released in the near future, but it
doesn't contain critical fixes, see changelog [1]

[1] http://www.sqlalchemy.org/trac/browser/sqlalchemy/trunk/CHANGES


Attachment: pgpaz3Pm0x9Be.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: