Jordi Mallach <jordi@debian.org> writes: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:41:26AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: >>> translation updates. There's a segfault and memleak fixes in CVS that I >>> can apply to 2.0.1 and upload to unstable if there's chances of getting >>> it accepted in etch. If not, I'll just wait for 2.0.2, not targetted at >>> etch. >> segfault/memleak certainly sound like important bugfixes to me; I'm willing >> to consider them. > I uploaded nano 2.0.2-1 to unstable nearly 3 weeks ago, with the > intention of getting it approved in etch. Unfortunately, I didn't review > the diff closely enough, and besides the above segfault/memleak fixes, > there are other minor bugfixes which appear (after 3 weeks) to be stable > and safe (no reports in the upstream mailing list, no known regressions, > etc.). > > If approving 2.0.2-1 is possible, this is my prefered option, obviously. > The diff is "big", but excluding comments and docs, it's not that scary. I have reviewed it and think it's fine. I would like to have Frans approval, as nano has a udeb, though. > - General: > - Miscellaneous comment fixes. (DLR) Really rocked the diff, that one. Marc -- BOFH #52: Smell from unhygenic janitorial staff wrecked the tape heads
Attachment:
pgpzVxii9rHj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature