Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> writes:
> * bsdmainutils 6.1.5
> only the maintainer changed, would be nice to have it up2date in
> etch
No
> * cdparanoia 3.10+debian~pre0-4
> only slightly updated kfreebsd patch in order to work together with
> kdemultimedia, does not have any effect on to be released platforms
> (#402208).
Done, but not really needed. Only because the diff was so short
> * glib1.2 1.2.10-17
> -15 and -17 updates libtool in order to build on kfreebsd, does not
> have any effect on to be released platforms (#261315).
> -16 fixed the nasty underquoting in glib.m4 (#396667).
Done.
> * goobox 0.9.93-7
> fixes a RC typo in debian/control (#401450).
Done.
> * hostname 2.93
> only the maintainer changed (and some really trivial debian/*
> simplifications), would be nice to have it up2date in etch
No
> * pyslide 0.4-6
> moved diff.gz upstream modifications into a dpatch, and orphaned the
> package. Would be nice to have it no longer pointing to me in etch.
No
> * traceroute 1.4a12-21
> only the maintainer changed (and some really trivial debian/*
> simplifications), would be nice to have it up2date in etch
No
> * linux-modules-contrib-2.6 and linux-modules-nonfree-2.6
> the debian/* parts are identical to linux-modules-extra-2.6,
> building only the binary modules out of module-source packages.
> should be definitely included in etch.
Left for later
> * dahb-html 3.1.2.15-1
> this is a new upstream release of an online-book, should be
> no problem to hint this one in :)
he@ries:~$ debdiff /org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/pool/non-free/d/dahb-html/dahb-html_3.1.2.1{4,5}*.dsc | wc -l
17876
I don't think so.
> * kqemu 1.3.0~pre9-3
> adds a missing file required when building the binary-module
> old-style (without m-a, without make-kpkg, #401174).
Done.
> ...and there are a few packages of mine where I suggest to hint them
> into testing...
>
> * dwm 2.6-1 and dwm-tools 4
> upstream has a extremous 'release often' policy, each minor fix
> gets a new upstream version. those fixes are simple, but important
> (e.g. for utf)
No, until you show a bug.
> * tinyerp-client and tinyerp-server 4.0-1
> although it is a new major version, not much changed.
> the new upstream release is a bugfix and l10n update mostly,
> and only a few simple feauture additions, which were already present
> in 3.5 (has been some weeks in experimental already).
No.
> ...and there are a few which are strange, where I'd like to ask for help
> in getting more information about
>
> * unionfs 1.4+debian-3
> should have had entered testing since quite a while,
> i don't know why it didn't, there is no bug.
he@ries:~$ madison unionfs
unionfs | 1.0.11-1 | stable | source
unionfs | 1.4+debian-3 | testing | source
unionfs | 1.4+debian-3 | unstable | source
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
195: SOAP
"Verbotene Liebe" ala Microsoft (Bernd Dutkwoski)
Attachment:
pgpxor_BPPE_B.pgp
Description: PGP signature