On 2006-12-26 14:11:39 +0100 Martin Zobel-Helas <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 11:59:55 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
>>>> is it possible to let this version go into testing.
>>>> it improves the font in many ways, here's the upstream
>>> I'm not keen to unblock it as it's a new upstream version with lots >of
>> i am keen to have it unblocked. i trust upstream, i have tested upstream,
>> i say it's good. i wouldn't ask you to unblock it if i wasn't sure of the
>> equal-to-better quality of the current version.
> 10 files changed, 184914 insertions(+), 7850 deletions(-)
> To go a little bit into more details:
> + Upstream Changelog removed
> + Many docs removed
> + New tex documents added
> And i see NO changes that are RC. What needs to be fixed for that
> package in Etch?
> Do you REALLY think this is a valid candidate to be unblock? I don't
> think so.
Yes I REALLY REALLY think so. WOULD I ELSE ASK FOR IT? oh well do whatever