Re: ttf-junicode
On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 19:04:43 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> On 2006-12-26 14:11:39 +0100 Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel@ftbfs.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue Dec 26, 2006 at 11:59:55 +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> >> hello
> >>
> >>>> is it possible to let this version go into testing.
> >>>> it improves the font in many ways, here's the upstream
> >>>> changelog:
> >>>
> >>> I'm not keen to unblock it as it's a new upstream version with lots >of
> >>> >changes...
> >>
> >> i am keen to have it unblocked. i trust upstream, i have tested upstream,
> >> i say it's good. i wouldn't ask you to unblock it if i wasn't sure of the
> >> equal-to-better quality of the current version.
> >
> > 10 files changed, 184914 insertions(+), 7850 deletions(-)
> >
> > To go a little bit into more details:
> > + Upstream Changelog removed
> > + Many docs removed
> > + New tex documents added
> >
> > And i see NO changes that are RC. What needs to be fixed for that
> > package in Etch?
> >
> > Do you REALLY think this is a valid candidate to be unblock? I don't
> > think so.
>
> Yes I REALLY REALLY think so. WOULD I ELSE ASK FOR IT? oh well do whatever
> you want.
It's freeze time, so a package in testing only gets fixed if it has RC
bugs. Go and read Andi's and Steve's mails to understand why your
package is not going to be approved.
So yes, i mind.
Greetings
Martin
--
[root@debian /root]# man real-life
No manual entry for real-life
Reply to: