Re: Security status of Etch
Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> - Imagemagick needs a co-maintainer. The current maintainer seems
>> really busy and hasn't replied to mail with patches since about
>> a month. It also needs a fix for #393025, it anyone wants to NMU
>> please ping me for a patch.
>
> I'm currently working on an NMU to fix the most urgent outstanding bugs.
> It's mostly ready, apart from a regression in the SGI coder. Hm, I
> should probably sprinkle a few pending tags here and there.
Great, thanks.
> I'm trying to take care that Imagemagick remains in a releaseable state,
> but I cannot take on responsibility for day-to-day maintenance.
If graphicksmagick is a cleaner fork of imagemagick it might be a good
idea to phase out imagemagick for Etch+1? (Just a wild, uninformed thought,
I don't use neither of the two).
Cheers,
Moritz
Reply to: