[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?



On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:41:59PM -0400, Mark Duckworth wrote:
> I have a Falcon/CT60 with EtherNAT (MII driver support for linux may or
> may not work easily), several compaq P3 xeon servers that could run
> aranym instances (all with very large 80+GB drives) and a M5484LITE
> board that could run linux, but I'd have to get a disk controller of
> some sort for it.  I think USB 2.0 card + external USB 2.0 high speed
> drive would work best.  Let me know how to get buildd working right and
> I'll help.  Does my debian need to be configured specially or does it
> have a chroot?  I downloaded buildd before but I was a little confused.

Maybe it could be a great opportunuity to try out using distcc+crossgcc
on real hardware ? 

distcc+crossgcc has the potential of making builds much faster, which
would make m68k acceptable by the security team.

I tried it on aranym and that worked fine.

Cheers,
-- 
Bill. <ballombe@debian.org>

Imagine a large red swirl here.



Reply to: