[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: m68k not a release arch for etch; status in testing, future plans?

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:45:55PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> > The point is that these release criteria have practically enforced a black 
> > and white scheme - either you're with us or you're on your own.
> Actually, Anthony Towns described about a half-dozen distinct
> possibilities, and outlined the advantages and disadvantages of each.
> The m68k porting team had a long time to work on making any one of
> these a reality, but has (apparently) done very little of it.

Just because we haven't made a bunch of noise about it, doesn't mean we 
haven't been working.

Dude, either help or go away.



Stephen R. Marenka     If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: