[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: hint for libofx

On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:29:24PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:

> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 06:33:36PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:

> >> I think a hint for libofx is in order to complete its transition, if I
> >> understand everything right.

> > Your subsequent mails suggest you might already know this, but:

> > gnucash (2.0.1-2 to 2.0.1-3)
> >     Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG
> >     Too young, only 8 of 10 days old
> >     out of date on m68k: gnucash (from 1.8.10-19) (but m68k isn't keeping up, so nevermind)
> >     Not considered
> >     Depends: gnucash dbus
> >     Depends: gnucash libofx
> >     Depends: gnucash fontconfig (not considered)

> > not going anywhere until fontconfig and, subsequently, dbus, are ready; and
> > then it needs to go in together with dbus.

> Um, the new gnucash does depend on the new libofx.  But the converse
> is *not* true.

> According to what I can see:

> * Updating libofx makes 2 depending packages uninstallable on i386:
>   grisbi, kmymoney2

That's not consistent with the britney output:

trying: libofx
skipped: libofx (35 <- 587)
    got: 8+0: i-8
    * i386: gnucash, grisbi, kmymoney2

Nor is it consistent with what I see currently listed on haxx.se.

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Reply to: