Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
In linux.debian.kernel Ron Johnson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
>> true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for
>> me to ignore the opinion of the debian-legal@ armchair lawyers.
>Could they have signed license agreements that we (not being
>executives of RHAT and Novell) don't know about?
While it may be possible in theory, it's also very hard to believe.