Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
In linux.debian.kernel Nathanael Nerode <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>What can be done about this?
>>Accept that most people do not consider this a problem?
>First of all, this is false. Most Debian developers agree with me. You
This is unproven.
>think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release team
I had such a plan, but no time to implement it currently.
>agrees with me that this is a problem, and it is explicitly a release blocker.
It's not like they had a choice.
>You probably agreed to uphold the Social Contract in your Debian work.
>(Or were you "grandfathered in" before NM?)
I became a developer long before the NM process was created, and I
agreed to follow the "unclarified" social contract.