Re: Etch timeline is unrealistic because non-free firmware is NOT being dealt with
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release team
>>> I had such a plan, but no time to implement it currently.
>> How do you handle the fact that it is a license violation making the
>> thing illegal to distribute?
> I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be
> true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for
> me to ignore the opinion of the debian-legal@ armchair lawyers.
Could they have signed license agreements that we (not being
executives of RHAT and Novell) don't know about?
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----