Frans Pop wrote: > Reason is that libcairo still depends on -24 and thus d-i builds currently > fail as that version is no longer available. > Also, this means that the new directfb has to migrate to testing before we > can release d-i, which in turn means that all packages that depend on > directfb have to be able to migrate. Is there any reason that the new directfb really needs to be in testing? It's included in the g-i udebs, as long as they're internally consistent it can get to testing later. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature