Le Mer 31 Mai 2006 08:46, Raphael Hertzog a écrit : > On Wed, 31 May 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > Maybe, but biarch are what we have now, and what can be made to > > work. I asked this same question 6+ month ago, and you gave me the > > same reply, and multi-arch has not progressed an inch since then. > > This is wrong. Sven, please stop saying that nothing changed when > you're simply annoyed that it's not finished yet. > > In the last 6 months we had: > - multiarch support added to ld by Aurelien jarno yes but that work was partial, because to be fully multiarch-ready, libc needs a split into libc6/libc6-bin that was refused. > - a report from HP/Canonical about how to go forward wich do not states anything new, only gather the informations/ideas that already existed in one PDF, that's good, but nothing brilliant in that document. > - another proposition from Goswin van Brederlow (see his recent work > and bugreports on -dpkg) this is proposals, but not really action. It's not that I want to say that proposals are evil, but sven is not completely wrong. multiarch needs a lot of *work* to be done, where the single first line of code to achieve that is not really written. In your list, the sole usable tangible work is Aurélien's. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@debian.org OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpao5pplXdcO.pgp
Description: PGP signature